How we have worked
The starting point for the project is the master's degree course; Innovation and social entrepreneurship in work with vulnerable children and young people. The students on the course are social workers or child welfare educators who have a position in practice, mainly as employees in municipal welfare services and preferably in the child welfare service. These social workers are the main actors who will initiate the innovation and make contacts in the field of practice. Each innovation therefore consists of a social worker on the course, a contact person in practice and in addition to employees at the university who have the main responsibility for guidance, learning and development in each innovation project.
In 2023, we developed 16 lab experiments in local child welfare services and child welfare institutions, specifically in Oslo, Trondheim and several different municipalities in Norway. The projects were created through close collaboration with the various agencies, and what the innovation should entail was based on the individual service's need for development and change.
In 2024, we continued to develop the Famwel lab in its entirety and made some changes which meant that we worked to a greater extent in teams of 2-4 social workers from the master's course and a contact person from practice. Trondheim municipality is the main collaboration partner where 4 innovation teams were established. In addition, individual innovation trials were initiated in several other municipalities in Norway. See map.
In each innovation project, an innovation plan is drawn up, which is a strategy document for the further work. Midway through the work, we have had a meeting where all the project participants meet and present their work. Each project must then describe how the process has been and what has so far been the result of the innovation.
Famwel lab / social worker / Location 2023 | Famwel lab/ social worker/ place 2024 |
Support in school /Trude S. Lyng / BFT Trondheim municipality | Area-based social work v/ Caroline Aurland, Mathilde Sørøy Knudsen and Marie Olesen Solem Trondheim municipality |
Measures that help / Anne-Lise Sørensen and Oline Reling/ BFT Trondheim municipality | Østbyen Bog family service v/ Tshanda Debora Nyembwe and Elise Vik Duun / Trondheim |
Music therapy / Kristine O. Olsen/ BFT Trondheim municipality | Implementation of the Convention on the Rights of the Child v/ Julie Røset Bakkene and Martine Elise Nilsen Karlsen / Trondheim |
How to support parents in difficult times / Anna Marie Fjeldsæter/ BVT Trondheim municipality | Institution and Digibarnevern v/ Kirsten With Aasgård, Sofie Lynum, Nora Pedersen and Amalie Gjøsdal Wollmann / Trondheim |
System and integration /Helene Johansen and Andrea Birkeland/ BVT Trondheim municipality | Guidance for parents v/ Jannike Bardal / Child welfare service / Steinkjer municipality |
A resource perspective to strengthen the family care situation / Johanne Sanderson/ BVT Trondheim municipality | Thresholds for placement of young people/ Elling Hardeberg/ BFT Trondheim |
Health and empowerment / Julie Lund / Stendi childcare institution | Support for living conditions challenges Alver Barnevernstjeneste / Iselin Rossland |
Innovative methods to improve collaboration between child protection and NAV / Maria Lethiganga's NAV Alta | Course pilot for Together for Ullern Oslo / Andrea Bakken Eide |
Innovation - inclusion of the invisible voices /Ingrid Haugland/ Austevoll child protection service | Community and participation for students with challenges / Ålsesund, Ørskog school / Emilie Terøy Ødegaard |
Barnet's voice / Pia Grønlund/ Oslo/ Grunerløkka BVT | Collaboration between BFT and the Volunteering Center in Orkland municipality/ Alex Owen |
A room for senses and emotions / Ida Logthu Rise/ Rena family and youth centre | |
Environmental therapists at institution / Skjalg Myrhaug/ Betania Almahuset Alta | |
Drug prevention among young people / Mathilde Müller / Ullern Oslo | |
Uncovering violence among children in kindergarten / Sofie Karimi / Ullern Oslo | |
Information flow and preventive measures / Rune Holtung / Ullern Oslo |
Here comes three examples of different labs:
Innovation lab - Trondheim municipality - An inclusive "Tempesnakk"
Problem statement: How can we adapt Tempesnakk to ensure that people from different cultures have the opportunity to participate?
Several actors have been engaged in this project, including FROST-Eiendom, the volunteer centre, and the cultural unit. The cultural unit has previously supported area initiatives by assisting with the Tempe Festival, which has been held twice. Their expertise and experience in this type of work make them valuable partners. Collaborating with interpreters is especially important to ensure that Tempesnakk is communicated and marketed in a way that includes everyone. Local residents will also be crucial partners in identifying existing needs, as they are aware of what is required and can help shape Tempesnakk to suit all community members. We believe it would be beneficial to visit Tempe to talk directly with residents and gather their thoughts on what is necessary to encourage more participation in Tempesnakk.
To facilitate participation, we can engage with local residents through various outreach efforts. This could involve speaking to people on the streets or at local shops, or even knocking on doors. However, this approach may introduce bias regarding whom we connect with, particularly due to language barriers. Additionally, we can review how Tempesnakk has been executed in the past and analyze feedback from previous meetings. Consulting with a cultural guide can provide insights into the needs and desires of families from diverse backgrounds. The cultural guide can also assist us in connecting with relevant informants to ensure broader participation and input in the planning and implementation process.